08-23-2022, 00:43:05 AM
Okay, this might sound fucking ridiculous, but listen to me.
I don't think we should vote someone off today.
Sounds insane, right? But listen. Remember Matthew's claimed role? He's the King. If half the town is dead, he finds out who among the survivors is good.
So, we have 6 players remaining out of 11 players. If one more person dies, then it'll be 5 out of 11. That's less than half. Which means his ability would kick in. So, what's best for us is to not vote, since we barely have any evidence right now, and let the scum kill one person tonight. Then, the day cycle comes, Matthew tells us who the good guys are, and we target those who are evil.
Why not vote someone off today, though? Because if we vote off a good person, then we have 3v2. The scum kill someone, it's 2v2, and they win. If we don't vote off anyone, we start off tomorrow with 3v2 from the scum's kill, meaning we're still in the game, and we have the massive advantage from Matthew's role.
So, I say we leave this alone. No vote from me.
I don't think we should vote someone off today.
Sounds insane, right? But listen. Remember Matthew's claimed role? He's the King. If half the town is dead, he finds out who among the survivors is good.
So, we have 6 players remaining out of 11 players. If one more person dies, then it'll be 5 out of 11. That's less than half. Which means his ability would kick in. So, what's best for us is to not vote, since we barely have any evidence right now, and let the scum kill one person tonight. Then, the day cycle comes, Matthew tells us who the good guys are, and we target those who are evil.
Why not vote someone off today, though? Because if we vote off a good person, then we have 3v2. The scum kill someone, it's 2v2, and they win. If we don't vote off anyone, we start off tomorrow with 3v2 from the scum's kill, meaning we're still in the game, and we have the massive advantage from Matthew's role.
So, I say we leave this alone. No vote from me.