02-02-2022, 08:00:06 AM
Look, trying guilt trip people into not executing, while ostensibly a "good" strategy, is kind of petty. This isn't a specific targeting. There'll be more mafia games, and someone was going to die first. The point is, objectively, the strategy of executing someone before anything happens is a good strategy compared to not executing, and I see two options here.
1. You either are working with the scum team and deliberately tried to get a non-execution to happen, either through some knowledge of mafia undisclosed or because you didn't want to risk losing a team member and made the choice.
or
2. You tried to push back on an argument that it's numerically better to execute first day with "I don't want to do what numbers say I should do" for no reason other than you wanted to make a suboptimal play, then tried to back out when I pointed out it's actively helping the scumteam without trying to come up with someone to vote for who's not you, however tenuous the logic. (Hell, my logic was possibly Knife and/or Whistle and/or Cassie, because the first two threw out good power roles, which implies throwing them out for the well-liked nightkill privileges and Cassie because giving up nightkill privilege seems like an unlikely choice under any circumstance, worries of unbalanced game or not. The worst case there is that everything just gets rerolled again, which changes nothing fundamentally. My logic is based entirely on one fragment of information.)
If the first option is true, which it might be, it's best to proceed with the execution. If the second option is true, which it also might be, I don't think it's worth risking the first option being true in the first place.
So basically, I'd like a roleclaim from Knife, from Whistle, from Cassie, and from Smily. I will also roleclaim once I've received two claims. If someone roleclaims a power role, we'll see what we can do to confirm that.
1. You either are working with the scum team and deliberately tried to get a non-execution to happen, either through some knowledge of mafia undisclosed or because you didn't want to risk losing a team member and made the choice.
or
2. You tried to push back on an argument that it's numerically better to execute first day with "I don't want to do what numbers say I should do" for no reason other than you wanted to make a suboptimal play, then tried to back out when I pointed out it's actively helping the scumteam without trying to come up with someone to vote for who's not you, however tenuous the logic. (Hell, my logic was possibly Knife and/or Whistle and/or Cassie, because the first two threw out good power roles, which implies throwing them out for the well-liked nightkill privileges and Cassie because giving up nightkill privilege seems like an unlikely choice under any circumstance, worries of unbalanced game or not. The worst case there is that everything just gets rerolled again, which changes nothing fundamentally. My logic is based entirely on one fragment of information.)
If the first option is true, which it might be, it's best to proceed with the execution. If the second option is true, which it also might be, I don't think it's worth risking the first option being true in the first place.
So basically, I'd like a roleclaim from Knife, from Whistle, from Cassie, and from Smily. I will also roleclaim once I've received two claims. If someone roleclaims a power role, we'll see what we can do to confirm that.
I am the They who says it!

