07-28-2022, 09:17:50 AM
/vote Matthew (Mr Somebody)
Matthew: Thank you for the analysis on Kennifer, but no.
You put a vote on me instantly for my meme vote (though to your credit retracted it later). That wasn't a deliberated vote.
Not every vote against you is going to be scum.
Not instantly accusing people because it'd attract attention isn't proof of innocence. This seems to be exactly the main reason you accused Kennifer now.
Not every third party is a Jester or even like one. An example would be a Serial Killer. I don't know why you keep mentioning third parties long after we basically dismissed it. Considering how to me, you've mostly just been digging yourself deeper, the main possibilities are either that you're mafia-type evil pretending to be a Jester, or this is a double-bluff and I have just been played. Why an innocent would even hint that they're a Jester is beyond me. Honestly, I think the former is more likely because an actual Jester would use the element of surprise to their advantage, and the fairness of an unannounced Jester in a setup where the roles aren't known would be debatable.
And about your claim: I feel like there has to be more to it than you've let on if you're good. Unlike Florien, I wouldn't have voted you just for being a known Miller.
If there's no Janitor (i.e. no-one shows up as "Cleaned" or something), then DAoM could be anything to me. Because he's barely said a word and his claim is plausible as either side, we have very little to work with.
Whistle: Names ≠ Alignment. I am suspicious of Florien, but I'm more suspicious of artsy and Matthew, and I think the latter should be today's vote. We'll come back for Florien unless we have any new leads in the meantime. Just be careful.
Florien: What makes sense if Whistle is scum, aside from her behaviour? Sheeping is a thing. It's weird that she sheep-voted onto you rather than Matthew, who I'm more sus of. But her claim is believable to me; I think that if she's this new, she couldn't have made it up. For now, she has the benefit of the doubt to me.
Kennifer: I've not paid enough attention to you, admittedly. But considering that I had a bunch of other scumreads/scumleans, I townlean you by process of elimination right now. But I should read what you've said properly.
I feel like it's strange that Florien isn't doubling down on Matthew right now, considering that they said we should just off him instantly for the Miller claim. They may be using Whistle as an opportunity to draw attention away from him. So even if Matthew is evil, be aware that they may have bussed him.
Matthew: Thank you for the analysis on Kennifer, but no.
You put a vote on me instantly for my meme vote (though to your credit retracted it later). That wasn't a deliberated vote.
Not every vote against you is going to be scum.
Not instantly accusing people because it'd attract attention isn't proof of innocence. This seems to be exactly the main reason you accused Kennifer now.
Not every third party is a Jester or even like one. An example would be a Serial Killer. I don't know why you keep mentioning third parties long after we basically dismissed it. Considering how to me, you've mostly just been digging yourself deeper, the main possibilities are either that you're mafia-type evil pretending to be a Jester, or this is a double-bluff and I have just been played. Why an innocent would even hint that they're a Jester is beyond me. Honestly, I think the former is more likely because an actual Jester would use the element of surprise to their advantage, and the fairness of an unannounced Jester in a setup where the roles aren't known would be debatable.
And about your claim: I feel like there has to be more to it than you've let on if you're good. Unlike Florien, I wouldn't have voted you just for being a known Miller.
If there's no Janitor (i.e. no-one shows up as "Cleaned" or something), then DAoM could be anything to me. Because he's barely said a word and his claim is plausible as either side, we have very little to work with.
Whistle: Names ≠ Alignment. I am suspicious of Florien, but I'm more suspicious of artsy and Matthew, and I think the latter should be today's vote. We'll come back for Florien unless we have any new leads in the meantime. Just be careful.
Florien: What makes sense if Whistle is scum, aside from her behaviour? Sheeping is a thing. It's weird that she sheep-voted onto you rather than Matthew, who I'm more sus of. But her claim is believable to me; I think that if she's this new, she couldn't have made it up. For now, she has the benefit of the doubt to me.
Kennifer: I've not paid enough attention to you, admittedly. But considering that I had a bunch of other scumreads/scumleans, I townlean you by process of elimination right now. But I should read what you've said properly.
I feel like it's strange that Florien isn't doubling down on Matthew right now, considering that they said we should just off him instantly for the Miller claim. They may be using Whistle as an opportunity to draw attention away from him. So even if Matthew is evil, be aware that they may have bussed him.
What else needs saying?
TRIPLE STAR
That's what you are.
Amazing!
TRIPLE STAR
That's what you are.
Amazing!