07-23-2022, 06:27:07 AM
Hm. Matthew roleclaims miller of some persuasion. Obviously that's a policy-elimination, but I like my idea of getting rid of the more irritating thing first.
Right then, first, we compromise "compromise", then we make "somebody" pay for their crimes. That fails both, we look for the "light."
Lav drips with being some kind of bomber, I don't trust voting that off, as that probably leads to more people dying, though if they could clarify whether or not they'd get to direct their explosion, I would like to know. Because if it can be directed, there's a clear play.
As for Whistle, if you just tell me what your protection thing that you're implying you have does exactly, whether you were bound to a player from the start or if you can redirect your boundness, that would be useful.
Also maybe what player you're bound to so we can verify some things.
Right then, first, we compromise "compromise", then we make "somebody" pay for their crimes. That fails both, we look for the "light."
Lav drips with being some kind of bomber, I don't trust voting that off, as that probably leads to more people dying, though if they could clarify whether or not they'd get to direct their explosion, I would like to know. Because if it can be directed, there's a clear play.
As for Whistle, if you just tell me what your protection thing that you're implying you have does exactly, whether you were bound to a player from the start or if you can redirect your boundness, that would be useful.
Also maybe what player you're bound to so we can verify some things.
I am the They who says it!