03-23-2021, 00:10:01 AM
But without the credible threat of violence, how can I enforce my security? By forgoing the social contract, I became more like an semi-autonomous nation, and thus, I need credible threat of violence because I'm not under the social contract, I'm not forgoing any of my self-granted privileges to to the state in exchange for security, so I need credible threat of violence. I don't think proportionality is necessarily valid either, are we talking eye-for-an-eye proportionality? Or are we talking a more vague proportionality determined by the parties involved, or are we talking "I'll know it when I see it" proportionality? Because if it's the last of those, I don't know if I can trust all of you to have good judgement of what is proportional. That system would oppress my definition of proportionality. I will keep thievery to a minimum, of course, I'll only strip public property, I don't take stuff from people who aren't dead or soon-to-be-dead in the plane where I'm looting the stuff from normally. Well, aside from every time I went to a rich person's house. They couldn't stop me.
Kellensea tilts her head slightly.
Though, at least, unlike the others, you seem open to actually define what the fuck you're talking about. Not like this respect for the dead bullshit or this "my specific kind of life is just better than other life okay" bullshit.
Kellensea tilts her head slightly.
Though, at least, unlike the others, you seem open to actually define what the fuck you're talking about. Not like this respect for the dead bullshit or this "my specific kind of life is just better than other life okay" bullshit.
I am the They who says it!