[Fin] Time For Mafia - Game Over, Scum Wins

[Kennifer]

Yeah, me either. :/

[artsyGeek]

I am looking at those of us who hammered Playing the other day, though -- yes, I'm aware that includes me. I do find it interesting that Geek was both the first person to say Playing and the last one. Could be she said him randomly when she thought she had to say something, and was then was convinced he was looking sus.

..huh, didn't notice that. And well, I dunno, honestly. He did mention he might not be on for this, so it's kindaaaaaaa a mercy execution.

[wingedcatgirl]

Updoot: I accidentally forgot to include the activity rule in the OP, so I've edited that in now. For convenience, here it is again:

Prods and replacements: If a week passes without a particular player posting, they will be prodded. (That is, we'll send them a DM telling them to get back in the dang game.) If another week passes with no posts, they'll be replaced. Players may also be replaced at their own request, or if they pull some nonsense that obligates us to kick them out.

(It's literally copied straight from Murder U :V)

[PointMaid]

I'm going to say it, but not vote yet because I don't want to be premature and there's plenty of time left...

Based on what I said earlier, that I'm looking at all of us who voted for Playing, and that Geek was the first person and last person to vote for Playing... with the scant evidence I have, Geek is currently my number one suspect.

[Kennifer]

Yeah, I'm going to hold off voting for now too, unless someone's got some really good ideas or ends up acting sus.

And I don't see anyone acting too sus yet, at least not sus enough to hammer.

[wingedcatgirl]

You do have an entire week, so holding off on voting for now is certainly a viable option.

[PointMaid]

There is Sylvi's original point, though, that if nobody is forced to act or not or defend themselves, and nothing happens that would show anybody as sus... because nobody is doing anything... we're pretty out of luck getting any (more) clues from how people are acting.

[Kennifer]

Yeah, I'd rather not be hasty though, you know?

But yeah it is hard without any actual clues or anything, especially so soon in the game.

Or maybe I really am that rusty at this. :P

[wingedcatgirl]

Yeah, you should definitely, like, make suggestions and ask questions and react to other people's posts and stuff.

[GoldenCityBird]

I have the same suspicions as Point. Geek does seem a little sus, but I'll hold off on voting until she gets a chance to defend herself.

[PointMaid]

So, going to go over some of the evidence once again.

/vote Playing, maybe?

Geek's first vote for Playing, which was the first vote for him after Kennifer/Oz's vote (which had a rationale, at least).

Yeah, wasn't expecting this to be a daystart setup but might as well rl for now I guess, /vote Playing

...Which, note, was immediately followed by this. TBH? I find this almost more sus, because it's closer to hammering very early, even though he did eventually retract it, and also had no rationale, even joky.

What? I'm not voting for anyone because I don't want to eliminate a townie, or worse, a power role.

But you're saying it's not sus to eliminate random people, but it is to ask if you could not kill anyone? The reason you're voting for me is that I don't want someone dead for a dumb reason? Fuck that.

/vote Playing

Didn't Geek vote Playing, tho?

...As far as I can tell, Dookie was right about that. I couldn't see that Geek had formally retracted her vote and changed it to Goose. She shouldn't have had to say again she was voting for Playing again, so being first and last might not mean as much as I first thought. Although she did seem remarkably consistent in that vote for Geek regardless of the evidence (of whatever quality), as far as I can tell.

[wingedcatgirl]

Anyone have any thoughts on that, or anything else?

[Kennifer]

Yeah, that does seem a little odd...

...Unless Point is scum and she's really trying to deflect suspicion! :O :O :O

[PointMaid]

Which part(s) are you calling odd? All of it?

My position from the beginning is that I'm trying to get discussion going so there's at least some behavior to work with.

[Kennifer]

Mostly Geek, though I'm not sure I'm one to talk since I waffled a bit on mine, giving a weird reason first(like Goose did when voting me!), then not wanting to vote, then thinking Playing did seem a bit sus so changing my vote back... still not convinced on Geek though.

[PointMaid]

Yeah, I'm definitely not above seeing you as sus at this point, Oz. Sorry.

I would like to hear from some more people.

[Kennifer]

Lol I'm just rusty, honest. My switch to novoting was because I didn't want a repeat of the thing in God Complex; we were all supposed to vote randomly (and secretly) as a "test" or something, and I didn't think anyone would actually get executed but it was a tie and two people actually got executed... without evidence, on day one.

And I switched back because honestly Playing seemed a little sus. My bad. But also a lot of people's bad.

[PointMaid]

Yeah, I definitely contributed to that. My bad.

[Kennifer]

Okay, well, let's look at people who voted abruptly and/or without an actual reason, whoever they voted for.

[artsyGeek]

..fuck, I forgot this


Anyways, yeah. Thought Playing might not be able to play this for a while, so I voted him out of pity, if you can even call it that.

[PointMaid]

So we're down to... about three days left. Anyone who hasn't said anything yet this day phase care to chime in?

[Dookie]

Idk, we only have suspicion right now, but that might be all we have left to go on.

[Caret]

Yeah. Voting Kennifer was just a joke, but I digress. I don't really suspect anyone yet.

[Kennifer]

Ok, who else haven't we heard from yet this day phase?

[wingedcatgirl]

A prod has been sent to Subparman.