(08-06-2021, 12:16:18 PM)PointMaid Wrote: Hmmm....

> Is anyone missing a layer - like an outer shirt - they were wearing yesterday?

(08-06-2021, 12:46:24 PM)SomeLibre Wrote: >are there marks on the rope and what shape and size

1. Keeps switching his story between "I destroyed the knife and zapper before they were used" and "I destroyed the knife after it was used".
   

• If it was destroyed before use, why would it need to be destroyed? Libre claims to have destroyed the knife to avoid suspicion, but that was the case, how would Libre have known that he would become a "framing" victim? And to add on, destroying potential murder weapons isn't helping his case.
  
• If it was destroyed after use, that means he skinned the Tempests, destroyed the knife, and left it there like a dumbass.
  

(08-07-2021, 01:08:12 AM)Florien Wrote: Actually, Lars brings up an interesting point. Libre could not have known he was going to get framed, so why choose to destroy the knife and gun, and why choose to do it at night? Would it not be better to do it in view of other people, so that it would be obvious that those weapons had not been used due to their destroyed nature? Instead, we find them the next day, mysteriously broken, next to a dead body.

(08-07-2021, 01:11:55 AM)PointMaid Wrote: ...I brought up those points as soon as Libre said he'd destroyed the knife and zapper thing. None of us heard him say he'd do that or saw it. And I'm still wondering how he knew he'd be framed. He insists he knows he was going to be framed but refuses to say how.

(08-07-2021, 01:15:11 AM)Kennifer Wrote: ju2t haviing a kniife and zapper doe2 not guarantee he would be framed, iif he want2 that two be hii2 argument. and ii agree iif he wa2 that worriied about iit he would have thought two get riid of them before niight fell 2o nobody would thiink two u2e them for a frame job iin the fiir2t place.